Abigail Adams to William Smith, 5 February 1800
Abigail Adams to William Smith
Philadelphia Febry 5 1800
my dear Sir
Several of Your favours have come safe to hand for which
I thank You. in Your last You Mention it probable that mr Strong will be
Voted for as Govenour—a very good Man, who will be acceptable to every good
Man, not devoted to Party, but to enable a Man who has not a fortune to spend in the public
Service, and who has a large and increasing family to provide for, it will
be necessary to enlarge the sallery.1 this I see has been attempted, tho
lost. I think it ought not to be given up, but a new Bill brought in and
make it more the next attempt, then You will carry the Vote for what You
tried for—in the next place.2
as you chuse to have the Govenour reside with You instead of Works of
superproportion, Such as Erecting two statues to one Man—would it not be
Eligible to Build a House for Your chief Majestrate Suitable to the dignity
of his office and to the stile which our dear State exacts of a Govenour,
and which they are well able to afford? to lose the talents of a Man well
fitted for the Station merely through a mistaken parsimony, is not giving an
equal chance to merrit. it is creating an aristocracy of Wealth, for if no
Man can be Govenour, but Such as can afford it, Wealth and not merrit will
be sought for—tho as in Sumner, they
were happily united—Yet we have no reason to expect that will always be the
case.—
You inquire of me whether citizen Randolph is a relation of the precious confessor— I am told that he is a distant Branch of the same honorable stock, that he read Law with him during Some part of his residence in this City— Aristotle defined a Man to be an upright unfeatherd animal—now according to him this Beardless Youth may lay claim to the title.3 But he looks more like “an unfinishd thing, one knows not what to call His Generation’s so equivocal”4
we are told by some persons here in the confidence of that the Anti party mean to put up mr Gerry for Govenour—and tho I do not think he would make the worst, I do not believe he would be the best Man for the office— I hope the federal interest will unite in Electing a wise prudent and anti party Man to the office the harmony and happiness of the state so essentially depend upon Such a choice, that every person who wishes for its prosperity will exert themselves to effect it—
My kind Regards attend all Friends / affectionatly Yours
A A—
RC (MHi:Smith-Townsend Family Papers); addressed by Louisa Catharine Smith: “William Smith Esqr / Boston”; endorsed: “Philaa. 5 Feby 1800 / Mrs. Adams / Ansd. 23 Feby—”
1. Not found.
2. In late January the Mass. General Court debated a bill to increase the governor’s salary from £800 to £1,100, but it was rejected (Massachusetts Mercury, 28 Jan.; Boston Columbian Centinel, 1 Feb.). For the Massachusetts gubernatorial election, see AA to JQA, 27 April, and note 5, below.
3. Plato, The Statesman, sect. 266e.
4. Alexander Pope, An Essay on Criticism, Part I, lines 42–43.