Adams Papers

Adams’ Minutes of the Argument: Suffolk Superior Court, Boston, August 1772

Adams’ Minutes of the Argument1

Suffolk Superior Court, Boston, August 1772

Hill vs. Whiting

In this Case the Plaintiff has alledged that her Father died seized on the Thirtyeth of the Month. But the Jury have found that he died seised on the Twenty first of the Month.

1. Inst. 293. a.2 “Also where a Man will sue a Writ of Right, it behoveth that he counteth of the Seisin of himself or of his ancestors, and also that the Seisin was in the same Kings Time, as he pleadeth in his Plea. For this is an ancient Law used, as appeareth by the Report of a Plea in the Eire3 of Nottingham.”

Fitz. N.N.B. page. 69.4 Writ de Droit. “In this Writ he ought to count of his own Possession, or of the Possession of his Ancestor; otherwise the Writ doth not lie, and he ought to alledge Esplees” &c.5

From these Authorities it seems, that the Demandant must count of a Seisin at some certain Time as upon a certain Day, or within some certain Time as within such a Kings Reign, or within some other certain Time, and must prove accordingly.

32. H. 8. and 21 Jac. 1. Limitation of Real Actions.6 Bac. Abr. Vol. 3. 501.7

Holbeck vs. Bennett, 2. Lev. 11. 2. Saund. 317.8

Blackwell vs. Eales, 5. Mod. 286.9

Rex vs. Bishop of Chester, Skin. 660.10

Lane vs. Alexander, Cr. Ja. 202.11

Cro. Car. 360.12

2. Comyns’s Rep. 12. 13.13

3. Lev. 193. W[he]r[e] Day is made Parcell of the Issue it is ill.14 Brooke Trav. pl. 40.15

2. Mod. 145. Brown vs. Johnson.16 Time is not traverseable. Plaintiff must alledge a Time for Forms sake but Defendant ought not to make Time Parcell of the Issue.

Court unanimous that the Day is not material, and therefore the Plaintiff recover.

1In JA’s hand. Adams Papers, Microfilms, Reel No. 185.

2Coke, Littleton description begins Edward Coke, First Part of the Institutes of the Lawes of England;or, Commentarie upon Littleton, 2d edn., London, 1629. description ends *293a. Quotation marks supplied.

3The court of justices in Eyre, royal judicial officials who held court on circuit in medieval times. Plucknett, Concise History description begins T. F. T. Plucknett, Concise History of the Common Law, 5th edn., London, 1956. description ends 144–146.

4Fitzherbert, New Natura Brevium description begins Anthony Fitz-Herbert, New Natura Brevium, London, 1755. description ends 69 (London, 8th edn., 1755) Quotation marks supplied. The quotation is actually from a section on writs of right of advowson, a special variety of the writ dealing with the right to present a candidate for a church or benefice. In the section dealing with writs of right generally there is a similar statement, with the qualification, perhaps dangerous to JA’s position, that “If he count the Seisin of his Ancestor, he may alledge the Seisin in the Time of King Richard the First.” Id. at 11.

5That is, the products of the land. It was alleged here. See the declaration, p. 36, note 14, above.

6The statute, 32 Hen. 8, c. 2, §2 (1540), provides that no writ of entry may be maintained upon the seisin of an ancestor or predecessor which was not in effect within fifty years prior to the date of the writ. As to the statute of 21 Jac. 1, see text and note 7 above.

73 Bacon, Abridgment description begins Matthew Bacon, New Abridgment of the Law, London, 1736–1766; 5 vols. description ends 501–504, setting out the statutes cited in note 6 above.

8Holbeck v. Bennett, 2 Lev. description begins Creswell Levinz, Reports of Cases in the Court of King’s Bench and Common Pleas, during the time of Sir R. Foster, Sir R. Hyde and Sir J. Kelyng were Chief Justices: also cases in other Courts during that time, London, 1702. description ends 11, 83 Eng. Rep. description begins The English Reports; 176 vols. A collection and translation into English of all the early English reporters. description ends 429; sub nom. Bennet v. Holbech, 2 Saund. description begins E. Saunders, Les Reports des Divers Pleadings et Cases en le Court del Bank le Roy en le temp del Reign de le Roy Charles II, London, 1686–1687; 2 vols. description ends 317, 85 Eng. Rep. description begins The English Reports; 176 vols. A collection and translation into English of all the early English reporters. description ends 1113 (K.B. 1682) (Time and place of lease pleaded in avowry in replevin held not traversable, per Hale, C.J.). This citation and the remainder of the minutes, written in a hastier hand with a heavier pen, are JA’s on-the-spot notes of Quincy’s argument and the court’s ruling.

9Blackwell v. Eales, 5 Mod. description begins Modern Reports; or, Select Cases adjudged in the Courts of K.B., Chancery, C.P. and Exchequer, London, 1682–1738; 12 parts. description ends 286, 87 Eng. Rep. description begins The English Reports; 176 vols. A collection and translation into English of all the early English reporters. description ends 660 (K.B. 1696) (Time but a circumstance, where evidence of a thing done must be given; traverse taking issue thereof would be bad, and declaration alleging trespass on a day not yet come held aided by verdict).

10Rex v. Bishop of Chester, Skin. description begins Robert Skinner, Reports of Cases adjudged in the King’s Bench; with some arguments in special cases, London, 1728. description ends 651, 660, 90 Eng. Rep. description begins The English Reports; 176 vols. A collection and translation into English of all the early English reporters. description ends 291, 295 (K.B. 1696) (Failure to deny exact time of seisin in quare impedit does not admit it, because exact time immaterial; seisin generally in time of peace, &c. is enough).

11Lane v. Alexander, Cro. Jac. description begins George Croke, Reports of Cases in King’s Bench and Common Bench. Part 2, James, London, 1683. description ends 202, 79 Eng. Rep. description begins The English Reports; 176 vols. A collection and translation into English of all the early English reporters. description ends 177 (K.B. 1607) (In ejectment, where one copyhold is pleaded as being before another, denial of exact date of earlier copyhold held bad on demurrer as immaterial where question is which came first).

12This citation has not been identified. In all editions of Croke’s Reports in the Time of Charles I (“Cro. Car. description begins George Croke, Reports of Cases in King’s Bench and Common Bench, Part 3, Charles, London, 1657. description ends ”) consulted by the editors, page 360 is blank.

13An inadvertence for —— and Blackall v. Heal et al., 1 Com. description begins J. Comyns, Reports, King’s Bench, Common Pleas, and Exchequer [with] Special Cases in Chancery and Before the Delegates, London, 1744. description ends 12, 92 Eng. Rep. description begins The English Reports; 176 vols. A collection and translation into English of all the early English reporters. description ends 933 (K.B. 1696), another version of Blackwell v. Eales, note 9 above.

14An inadvertence for Dring v. Respass, 1 Lev. description begins Creswell Levinz, Reports of Cases in the Court of King’s Bench and Common Pleas, during the time of Sir R. Foster, Sir R. Hyde and Sir J. Kelyng were Chief Justices: also cases in other Courts during that time, London, 1702. description ends 193, 83 Eng. Rep. description begins The English Reports; 176 vols. A collection and translation into English of all the early English reporters. description ends 364 (K.B. 1666) (Traverse to declaration in debt on a judgment held bad on demurrer where it had effect of putting date of the judgment in issue).

15Apparently an inadvertence for Robert Brooke, La Graunde Abridgement, tit. Traverse per sans ceo, pl. 140 (London, 1586) (Debt on condition that defendant enter peacefully before Michaelmas; plea that he entered peacefully on such a day before the feast. Replication bad that he entered forcibly on another day, because day not traversable).

16Brown v. Johnson, 2 Mod. description begins Modern Reports; or, Select Cases adjudged in the Courts of K.B., Chancery, C.P. and Exchequer, London, 1682–1738; 12 parts. description ends 145, 86 Eng. Rep. description begins The English Reports; 176 vols. A collection and translation into English of all the early English reporters. description ends 991 (K.B. 1688) (In action of account, dates during which defendant was bailiff are matter of form, not issue).

Index Entries