Notes for a Letter to Gouverneur Morris, [2–16 August 1793]
Notes for a Letter to Gouverneur Morris1
[Philadelphia, August 2–16, 1793]
I | explanation of fitting out privateers Charlestown put on footing of their being no law2 | ||||||||||||||
II | Letter persisting in objection to it3 | ||||||||||||||
III | reclaims Gideon Henfield4 | ||||||||||||||
IV | very moderate answer that Courts will do right | ||||||||||||||
V | Concerning Sloop Republican5 | ||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
VII | Complaint of proceedings of District Court, against the William6—persons labour secretly to have misunderstood— | ||||||||||||||
VIII | Letter concerning Debt accomplish informal system since the fœderel Govt. without consulting Congress | ||||||||||||||
IX | Awkwardness Governor avails himself of political opinions | ||||||||||||||
☞ X | Letter—opinions private & public of President— on j’est empressé tu Je ne scais sous quelles influence—empressions etrangers complains of obstruction to consular jurisdiction7 |
||||||||||||||
X | Letter concerning Ship William requiring relinquishment | ||||||||||||||
XI | Letter concerning another Vessel on same situation | ||||||||||||||
XII | Letter concerning Little Democrat8—taken on account of the State to augment the marine of France—Commission &c | ||||||||||||||
I | Blamed in a conversation the judicial proceedings of the Consul—Ought only to have made a ministerial Inquiry— | ||||||||||||||
I | Case of the Swallow9 |
AD, Hamilton Papers, Library of Congress.
1. These notes were presumably drawn up to aid Thomas Jefferson in preparing his letter of August 16, 1793, to Morris, requesting the recall of Edmond Charles Genet as French Minister to the United States. See “Cabinet Meetings. Proposals Concerning the Conduct of the French Minister,” August 1–23, 1793, and “Cabinet Meeting. Notes Concerning the Conduct of the French Minister,” August 2, 1793. These notes should be compared with the final version of Jefferson’s letter printed in , Foreign Relations, I, 167–72.
In the Thomas Jefferson Papers, Library of Congress, is a document in Jefferson’s handwriting entitled “Alteration proposed in the letter to G. Morris, in consequence of an examination of the treaties between France & Great Britain.” At the foot of this document H wrote:
“submitted essentially in the same words without 22 | ![]() |
‘Not being subjects of either crown’ said to be in the same words with our 22 Article. The words of our Article are ‘not apartenant’ not belonging &c. The sense is the same but not the words. Approved with the remark which merely regards accuracy of expression. A Hamilton” |
Following H’s comment, Edmund Randolph wrote: “I am content either way. Edm. Randolph.” H’s advice was not taken, but it concerns the wording in the sixth paragraph of the letter Jefferson sent to Morris. For this paragraph, see ASP, Foreign Relations, I, 168.
2. See Genet to Jefferson, May 27, 1793 ( , Foreign Relations, I, 149–50).
3. Genet to Jefferson, June 8, 1793 ( , Foreign Relations, I, 151).
4. For the Gideon Henfield case, see Jefferson to H, June 1, 1793, note 1.
5. The Republican, formerly the British sloop Polly, was a French privateer fitted out at New York. See “Cabinet Meeting. Opinion Respecting the Measures to Be Taken Relative to a Sloop Fitted Out as a Privateer,” June 12, 1793, and “Cabinet Meeting. Opinion Respecting French Privateers,” June 17, 1793. The points H lists below were raised by Genet in his letter to Jefferson of June 8, 1793 ( , Foreign Relations, I, 151). See also Genet to Jefferson, June 17, 1793 ( , Foreign Relations, I, 154).
6. For the William, see Rufus King to H, June 15, 1793, and Jefferson to H and Henry Knox, July 25, 1793, note 1.
7. See Genet to Jefferson, June 22, 1793 ( , Foreign Relations, I, 155–56).
8. For the Petite Démocrate or the Little Sarah, see “Cabinet Meeting. Opinion on the Case of the Little Sarah,” July 8, 1793.
9. On June 18, 1793, the French consul at New York informed Genet that “The Swallow, an English letter of marque,… armed with eight cannon and twenty men at least, and appearing to be of about 150 tons burden, has anchored so long in this port, as to exclude the idea of her having entered in distress, though the 17th article of the treaty of commerce between France and America, formally excludes from the ports of both, the enemy vessels who shall have made prizes, and every English privateer which enters is authorized by the English Government to take, burn, and destroy, our vessels …” ( , Foreign Relations, I, 159). Genet sent this complaint to Jefferson on June 25, 1793 ( , Foreign Relations, I, 159).