Thomas Jefferson Papers

From Thomas Jefferson to Samuel R. Demaree, 6 May 1805

To Samuel R. Demaree

Washington May 6. 1805.

Sir

Your letter of Dec. 28. was handed to the Philosophical society, who referred the subject to a Committee, and recieved a report from them. they have inclosed me that report with a request that in communicating it to you I would at the same time convey their thanks for the attempt to promote a laudable object. a great and sudden change in the Alphabet of any language is probably not to be effected. much has been done in the English orthography from the Anglo-Saxon days to the present; tho’ we must acknolege something has also been lost, as they possessed two characters which we have abandoned altho they represented sounds peculiar to our language, and now represented by characters of far different powers. still a favorable tho’ slow progression in our orthography may be observed. thus, we are leaving out the u in favor, honor &c the ugh in tho,1 thro2 &c. the w and d in acknolege, altho’ the Dictionary makers have not yet ventured to admit it. still we are not to expect that perfection will ever be obtained in this or any other way; but probably the only way in which it can ever be approached will be to encourage gradual changes in practice. Accept my salutations & respects.

Th: Jefferson

PoC (DLC); at foot of text: “Mr. Samuel R. Demaree.” Enclosure: committee report by Peter S. Du Ponceau, Anthony Fothergill, and Benjamin Smith Barton to the American Philosophical Society, 1 Feb. 1805, on Demaree’s proposed alterations to the English alphabet; stating “that usage is the only lawful Sovereign of language, & that it cannot be controuled by any authority, how ever powerful or Arbitrary,” the committee is of the opinion “that the evil, if it be one, is not to be remedied by the efforts of this or any other similar Society” (MS in PPAmP).

inclosed me that report with a request: a letter from the American Philosophical Society to TJ, 15 Feb., with notation “Demaree’s communicn. alphabet” has not been found (Vol. 45: Appendix IV); see John Vaughan to TJ, 29 Apr.

1TJ first wrote “though” before canceling “ugh.”

2TJ first wrote “through” before canceling “ugh.”

Index Entries