Thomas Jefferson Papers

To Thomas Jefferson from Charles Pinckney, [February-22 May 1805]

From Charles Pinckney

[February-22 May 1805]

Dear Sir,

I wrote you a few weeks since by Mr. Gorham, & finding another safe opportunity by Mr. Preble, I avail myself of it, to send you a Duplicate of what I wrote before, and to add that subsequent events have proved and confirmed beyond a doubt what I then told you, which was, that my conduct & the stand I made here, was the true reason of precipitating the rupture between England & Spain. At the time I wrote by Capt. Dulton to Mr. Madison, in July, England had then determined Spain should remain neutral, and Soler, her Minister of Finance, had but a short time before that, written Circular Letters to all the Sea Ports to that effect—It was only upon the stand they saw1 I made here, and on the idea that our Government never would give way either on the Question of West Florida, or the Western limits of Louisiana2 or the great pecuniary one of the French Condemnations and Spoliations, and the difficulty of amicably arranging them, that made England decide to alter her plan, and strike at Spain—nothing less than the decision of my conduct, & the tone I gave to my proceedings, at that time, could have produced, at so early a period, an event so fortunate for us. When I have the pleasure of seeing you, I shall be able to explain much more than I choose to trust to paper, even by this, as I consider it, very safe opportunity—We are still waiting Mr. Cevallos’s answer to our third Letter, which is to be sent to you by this opportunity, and at present I can form no definitive opinion as to the result. I am extremely anxious about the conclusion as I wish so much to return, & also that we may be able to arrange every thing amicably, and annex Florida to our Republic—it is peculiarly valuable to us as a Nation, and in this light I wish it as a Citizen of the United States. as a Citizen of South Carolina, I am, if possible, still more anxious, because it will add great weight & security to that particular interest which Georgia South Carolina, Louisiana & Florida must compose, & which in the greatest part of its most valuable staples and productions, differ from the rest of the Union—these form, or will form when we obtain Florida, so great a proportion of the Territory of our Country, and particularly of its Sea-coast—its soil is so fertile & productions so extremely valuable, that there can be no doubt in a few years it will be so populous as to have great weight in the political scale, & enlightened, as I trust they will be, by their neighbours who, have the same local interests with themselves, it is to be hoped their weight will always be thrown into the republican one3—For these & many reasons, I am anxious now to annex Florida, and I confess I should not feel a little pleased in being one of the Instruments of doing it. I still have my fears we shall not get it at this time, as the French seem so anxious to make something out of it themselves—their expressing an opinion that West Florida is no part of the Cession of Louisiana, clearly proves this, & their wishing us to have no retrospect but in case of an agreement, only to date from the present time, is a clear proof that in case they find they are obliged to give way and can get no money from us, they wish all the monstrous grants of Land that have lately been made to Lauret & others, in which it is presumed Mr Talleyrand4 is concerned, should be held valid, well-knowing how much they would increase in value when forming a part of the United States, and I should not be surprised if even he Talleyrand5 & others should be anxious to have establishments and property there to which they may fly in case of new convulsions in Europe where every thing hangs by a thread, & they should escape with their lives—they are fully aware of this uncertainty & it is the conviction in my mind that it exists, which makes me (if France must have a Despot) prefer Bonaparte6 to a Bourbon7 while the one holds the reins all is uncertainty and force8 and you may be assured that republicanism is gaining ground, while the return of the other would bring with it the sanction of ages & the support of all the Monarchies of Europe thereby making its continuance & transmission much more regular & secure than the other—I have no doubt the republicans are at this moment the majority in France, and that they will continue secretly & silently to increase while Bonaparte9 holds the power, & that the moment he is no more, Liberty will have again a chance to do something—I am not one of those who suppose it is impossible for Frenchmen to be free—On the contrary, I think the french character, notwithstanding the unfortunate issue of their first attempt, is extremely improved even by the tempestuous Experiments they have made—I have therefore reason to believe their next essay will be made upon more moderate & rational principles, & succeed better—Our example will have an astonishing effect in removing the dangerous & false opinion that a people with an extensive Territory cannot be free and happy & continue united or protect themselves—it is now in the mouths of every well informed influential Frenchman, and this is so well known to Bonaparte10 that be assured he hates our Government and detests its effects more, if possible, than he does England, and that nothing on Earth would give him so much pleasure as to injure, or if possible destroy it11—his conduct in getting Louisiana & the navigation of the Missisipi into his hands when he did & his making the Spaniards stop the Deposit at New Orleans when he ordered it in 1802 are such unanswerable proofs of his Enmity to us as to leave no doubt of what would be his course if he had peace & the means to attend to it—As You must unquestionably hear it from another source I now inform you confidentially that the Deposit at New Orleans was stopped by the express Order & at the sole instance & application of the French Government & that I am now able to give you the highest most authentic & official proof of the fact & that it was only done by their order. but knowing You will recieve it from another & very respectable source I do not think it necessary now to give you my authority—there is nothing perhaps will astonish you & Mr Madison more than this fact & to You alone I now communicate it for the present in confidence: there is not a man in my office or about me who knows a word of the circumstances & therefore I put this in my own hand writing in this duplicate having ordered a blank to be left here on purpose to be filled up by myself after the rest was copied.

I well know the12 sensation that such a development would make in the minds of the American people against the French, & that in their general detestation and abhorrence of this perfidious & unmanly act, (for it was certainly unmanly to do it & deny it in the manner they did) they would be apt to confound the Nation with their Government, whereas I still hope the french Nation will be not only always friendly to us when it is in their power to act from themselves, but that they will be one day much more like us in their situation & pursuits—for this reason I keep it a profound secret & leave it to you, when you hear it from the other source, to determine what use is to be made of it. I had proceeded thus far in writing you, when Mr. Cevallos’s answer to our third note appeared. Our official letter to Mr. Madison will give a full account of it, & inclose a Copy by which you see fully that any further mildness & moderation are totally lost upon this Court, & that if we are to get what we have a right to, our Government must now look to a different course—in this, Mr. Cevallos has inserted a part of Mr. Talleyrand’s note to the Spanish Ambassador, in July last, respecting our claims, evidently calculated to threaten us with the resentment of France, should we presume to persevere in our Claims for french spoliations within the Spanish Territory—these13 remarks & particularly where he says “his Imperial Majesty would have expressed great displeasure at the Spanish Government had they entered into any arrangements with us respecting the french Condemnations & Spoliations & would have had this displeasure expressed in a much stronger manner to the United States” thereby treating us as Governments perfectly at his will & whom he could applaud or censure as he thought proper, will surprise you—this connected with the whole tenour of Mr Cevallos’s Letter & the charge by both Governments (French & Spanish) on us of wishing to be paid twice for the same thing must convince You that all my opinions respecting the inutility of any attempts except those of force or fear are well founded—that my conduct to them in July last was the only one calculated to obtain our rights & that we must either come to something like that again or yield them which I am sure You will never do—this last letter of the Spanish Minister Cevallos & the inclosures must shew You the Difficulties I have had to encounter here in every important Question I had to discuss—such particularly as the French Claims the attempt to purchase Florida the stopping the Deposit at New Orleans, the act of the 24 February & the refusal to ratify the Convention in all of which there can be no doubt France interfered as much as possible against us & that it is entirely owing to her Spain has been so extremely unfriendly to us & still continues so as they would be afraid to push things so far if they were not backed by France: the present state of things promises nothing but a continued & positive refusal on the part of this Government to comply with our offers & Your directions as to the Claims—this being confirmed by Mr Cevallos in his last conference. We have determined to send Mr Preble with our dispatches whom I recommend strongly to your notice & protection & Mr Madisons—he has assisted greatly here in writing & translating—is extremely intelligent & will be able to explain much to You—I am preparing to return the moment the Special Mission is ended which being begun in Mr Monroes & my name, it was proper I should continue in it until the End—I expect it will now terminate soon & I fear not as we wish & as we have upon all occasions used the utmost mildness & moderation it will be a new proof to You that neither those or Justice can be depended upon as having the least influence here or with France—that my conduct has been zealous & most completely disinterested in endeavouring to first persuade & afterwards to compell them to a different course & this in the face of the most polite & friendly attentions personally in proof of which I enclose You a copy of one of the Prince of Peace’s Letters to me dated only six days before Mr Cevalloss refusal to ratify the Convention & which will shew You the affectionate footing I was upon with him until then—in short there is no doubt they shewed me every kind of civility & particular personal attention in the hope it might make me recieve the refusal to ratify the Convention & to comply with our just demands as to the limits & french claims with less resentment than they well knew such treatment of our Government deserved, but they found they knew me very little to make such calculations—it was impossible for me who had at home so zealously & invariably opposed every attempt even from our own then Government & its Officers to injure the rights & insult the feelings of our citizens should suffer any foreign Government to do so merely from the ridiculous idea of being said to stand well with them—I would rather stand well with my own feelings & that our citizens should know that under no circumstances I can ever forget what belongs to their honour or rights & I am sure that my firm maintenance of them here has given me more respect in Europe than a contrary or more supple one would have done—

I have written you a long letter but the long & active & I trust steady & consistent part I have taken in the affairs of our own state & as far as I could in those of the United States make me feel an interest in them which is far more dear to me than any other consideration—I have been so much concerned in forming the constitutions of both & in doing all I could lately to bring them back to their original republican principles & place them in hands that I know will take care to keep them so that I own I am particularly anxious to explain to You my opinions & the motives of my conduct because I always wish to possess as I have hitherto done Your regard & good opinion & feeling as I do that my conduct in Europe is steadily & in the most disinterested manner maintaining the rights of our Citizens & the honour of our Government has invariably met the approbation of the European Governments I therefore consider it as giving me an additional claim14 to Your friendship for me & in this opinion I have written You this long & confidential letter & which I send you by a very confidential opportunity I shall keep this letter open to see if any thing occurs before the opportunity goes but I have little or no hope that any thing will be done here now—Mr Monroe has some & I wish I may be mistaken & he right—he is very zealous & leaves no proper means untried to accomplish it—I am very glad he is come as I am sure & indeed know he will tell you that he highly approved my conduct here in July last now acts upon it himself15 & sees by being present the necessity there was for it & that the stand I then made has been & will be productive of great public utility—being made on truly independent & American Ground, without considering the Views & opinions of any nation but our own it certainly attracted very much the attention of Europe & taught both France & Spain to know & feel the consequences of such conduct to us in future & should we ultimately succeed (which I still doubt) our firmness then & since the special mission begun will in the opinion of Mr   & myself have greatly contributed to it—

I keep this letter open until the return of Mr Dulton from Paris where we have sent to General Armstrong to see if any thing can be done there further or that it may yet be possible to get their influence to assist the negotiation here—


March 26: 1805

Captain Dulton returned last night with letters from General Armstrong stating that the French Answer is in the highest tone possible—that our claims as to West Florida & French Spoliations are totally unfounded & must be abandoned & that at all events & hazards & without a moments doubt & hesitation France will support Spain against us even should things proceed to extremities—thus it appears in the face of their most solemn promises they are determined to oppose us & to reduce our purchase of Louisiana to a mere nothing. however this may perhaps surprise You it does not me—When I recollect M Bs: conduct to us for the last 4 Years & particularly the one to get back the ratification of the cession of Louisiana after it had been compleated & stop it entirely & his earnest & irresistible desire to make peace with England that he & Spain together may pay more attention to us I see every moment new cause to wish the continuance of the War in Europe & for us to be on our guard the moment they think of peace—One would not suppose that England would be so lost to her own interest & safety as ever to join France & Spain against us but there is no knowing what misguided counsels stimulated by Revenge may prompt them to even against their own interest—When I recollect their former designs (in 1793) & see their present stupid & impolitic conduct in shutting us out of the West India Islands there is no knowing what even they may be tempted to do—

I enclose you an Extract which perhaps You have not seen & which gives us the View even Europe had of some of our former acts—every American must blush it had ever been possible for such remarks to be made & with truth—


April

It is now some weeks since we heard from Mr Cevallos & have written him a letter urging him to send us his answer to the Western Limits of Louisiana which he has promised & which closes the discussion of all the controverted points—after recieving this it must soon appear whether it is possible to do any thing here or now & as we have been now employed three months & very closely so indeed & the season advancing fast into summer I am hopeful we shall soon finish my anxiety being very great indeed To return with the greatest dispatch to Carolina & my little family—


April 26

We have just had another answer from Mr Armstrong stating that he had laid all our correspondence before Mr Talleyrand whose laconic & decisive answer was “that the more they considered the subject the more they (France) were convinced that Spain was right on every Question of the Controversy with us”—Some short time before this We had received Mr Cevalloss answer to the Western Limits confining them to the Natchitoches & thus abridging the once supposed extensive country of Louisiana to a mere nothing as to sea coast & proving what we scarcely ever doubted since the answer of France that she (France) wants to be paid Three times for this country—once as she was by us, secondly by Spain to save West Florida to her & place the Western Limit at the Natchitoches & if this succeeds then at some future period to sell the Floridas to us on something like the scheme already proposed through Mr   —& for a price not unlike that given for Louisiana & she to recieve the money from us—


May 18

Finding it impossible notwithstanding all our attempts to get from this Government any propositions in return for those we had made & Mr Monroe seeing clearly that it was in vain to expect any thing like such an amicable adjustment as we could alone accede to, thought that it would be best for us to send in at this stage our ultimatum which was done in the manner our public letters announce to which on the 15th We recieved Mr: Cevallos’s final rejection & refusal to do any one thing we expected or demanded—he refuses to pay a shilling for the french spoliations—to give up a foot of West Florida (as so called by the English) & scarcely a foot to the West of the Mississipi—in short he refuses every thing & has not even the decency to offer any thing or any mode of accommodation on the part of Spain—in return for great lenghth of time in attending on him, & for unexampled moderation & patience & every effort to conciliate he has displayed unwarrantable (in their situation at least) haughtiness of proceedure & a mode of rejecting all our claims which may be said to amount almost to defiance & contempt—Under these circumstances We have been inevitably compelled to put an end to the Special Mission & Mr: Monroe has this moment demanded his passports & audience of Leave to return to London & We are now waiting the answer


May 20: 1805 

Mr Cevallos’s answer is recieved appointing tomorrow for Mr Monroe’s audience of Leave & the Passport will be immediately granted to him & this answer which is enclosed will convince You that every thing I have hitherto said & transmitted You is strictly true & that nothing is to be done with this Court but by fear & force & by removing the idea that we are not entirely to be directed by France in this or any other attempt to assert our rights either here or elsewhere & that We will not sacrifice every national claim to peace & Commerce—Our public letter is so full on this subject that I omit many observations that may be made but I now hope You will think & I am sure Mr Monroe will tell You so, that in the very arduous & difficult situations I have had here for nearly four Years, with the whole influence of France constantly opposed to our claims that I have never once forgot what was due to the rights or honour of our country, nor ever once suffered the idea to exist that she was either to be managed by or subject to the influence of any power on Earth—In finishing the Special Mission as We have done We give to Spain & France an Example of moderation they by no means deserved at least as to the manner in which we conducted the whole negotiation, & our offer & the terms in which We made & explained them—although for four months continually requested to do so they have obstinately refused to make us any propositions in return for those We made & in positively refusing to pay a shilling for the french spoliations—to yield an inch of West Florida—to insist on a line between the Adaes & Natchitoches to cut the Red River on the Westn limits & even to refuse to ratify the Convention of August 1802 except they had the right to annex a Declaration thereto destructive of the claims established by the 6th Article (which Mr Madison positively forbid us to accept) they have given us such a defiance as will call up all those feelings for which the freemen of our Country have hitherto been so peculiarly distinguished

For my own part I am at a loss what to do I am so extremely anxious to return home that every Day appears like a month to me & yet there being no one here I choose to leave to represent the United States or who is qualified for diplomatic discussion & not thinking myself authorised16 to put an end to all diplomatic intercourse without your orders I am obliged to sacrifice my own interest & feelings & every personal consideration & remain sometime longer—Mr Monroe is decidely of opinion I ought to do so until I can get a proper person to take the place or until Mr Bowdoin or Mr Irvine arrives which I now find very uncertain & perhaps the honour of our Country makes it necessary they should not arrive until You know what has happened & direct accordingly—I am completely tired of this situation in which I have acted, as Consul, Agent for claims & Minister & in short every thing for this last two Years & besides being obliged to stay so long & so dreadfully inconveniently from home have been saddled with the most enormous Expences that can be concieved—but in this as on every other occasion I have made my personal convenience & my interest give way to public considerations & the only Reward I wish is that my Country should think of me as they have always done & to believe that nothing can make me forget what belongs to their national honour & independence—I do not suppose it is necessary to add any thing to what our public letters & this & my private one to Mr Madison contains which he will shew You—I know great pains have been taken by interested men & my Enemies to weaken the place I once held in your Esteem as a friend to Liberty—I will hope You are too just to let any thing prejudice me with You until You see & hear me & give me an opportunity to detail what I know of men & things in Europe—I have not been an inattentive or unfeeling spectator nor an inactive one—Whatever You may for a moment have thought, I believe now I shall recieve from You, as I know I well deserve & will recieve from the American People at least the acknowledgement that I have refused to yield their rights in Europe with the same firmness I did at home & that although We have not been able to succeed yet that We have preserved our claims inviolate & have left to our Government & fellow Citizens the same opportunity to display their Zeal in asserting & defending, that We did in refusing to yield them—in your hands I am convinced they are always safe. the territory & pecuniary claims in Question are of great value, but much greater are the important & delicate points of national honour. in the refusal of Spain & the interference of France are involved not only in a high degree our national honour but little less than our independence, or at least our free agency as a nation & on the trying crisis I am to rejoice they are in hands so able & honest as they now are—

I am hopeful soon to see you in Washington & to assure You personally of the affectionate regard & respect with which I am always

Dear Sir Yours Truly

Charles Pinckney

May 22: 1805

In Aranjuez

I must request You to correct a mistake in the long piece of 21 March 1803 to the Prince of Peace copy of which I sent You in my last as on looking over another copy made by the same clerk I find he omitted the word “not” which was in the original sent to the Prince & is also in my office Book—the original as sent to the Prince positively asserted that Florida did not include any part of the East Bank of the Mississipi on which assertion You will find We acted all through—

As my Expence at the Kings Sitio under the Special Mission has been totally extra I have by Colonel Monroe’s desire & advice charged it as such, as there can be no doubt of Your allowing it—

I beg leave to present Captain Dulton to You as a most deserving Citizen—

RC (DLC); consisting of an undated Dupl of Pinckney’s letter to TJ of February 1805 (see Vol. 45:594-600) with six additions dated 26 Mch. to 22 May; initial portion in a clerk’s hand with emendations by Pinckney (see notes 1-11 below); remainder in Pinckney’s hand (see note 13); at head of text in Pinckney’s hand: “To serve as a duplicate to the last & with additions to which I request Your particular attention”; endorsed by TJ as received 2 Aug. and so recorded in SJL. Enclosure: Pedro Cevallos to James Monroe and Pinckney, Aranjuez, 20 May; Cevallos has presented the king and queen with an account of the Americans’ 18 May letter requesting a passport and an audience of leave for Monroe; in response, “their Majesties have fixed to-morrow” for Monroe’s audience and Cevallos will send the necessary passport (ASP description begins American State Papers: Documents, Legislative and Executive, of the Congress of the United States, Washington, D.C., 1832-61, 38 vols. description ends , Foreign Relations, 2:667). Other enclosure printed below.

we have sent to General Armstrong: Monroe to John Armstrong, 15 Feb., 26 Feb., and 1 Mch. (Madison, Papers, Sec. of State Ser. description begins William T. Hutchinson, Robert A. Rutland, J. C. A. Stagg, and others, eds., The Papers of James Madison, Chicago and Charlottesville, 1962- , 43 vols.; Sec. of State Ser., 1986- , 12 vols.; Pres. Ser., 1984-2020, 11 vols.; Ret. Ser., 2009- , 3 vols. description ends , 9:80, 82n; Monroe, Papers description begins Daniel Preston and others, eds., The Papers of James Monroe, Westport, Conn., 2003- , 7 vols. description ends , 5:317-19, 327-9; ASP description begins American State Papers: Documents, Legislative and Executive, of the Congress of the United States, Washington, D.C., 1832-61, 38 vols. description ends , Foreign Relations, 2:636).

letters from General Armstrong: Armstrong to Monroe, 12 Mch. and 18 Mch. (Daniel Preston, A Comprehensive Catalogue of the Correspondence and Papers of James Monroe, 2 vols. [Westport, Conn., 2001], 1:166; Monroe, Papers description begins Daniel Preston and others, eds., The Papers of James Monroe, Westport, Conn., 2003- , 7 vols. description ends , 5:362; ASP description begins American State Papers: Documents, Legislative and Executive, of the Congress of the United States, Washington, D.C., 1832-61, 38 vols. description ends , Foreign Relations, 2:636).

For an earlier report of Napoleon Bonaparte’s desire to get back the ratification of the cession of Louisiana, see Robert R. Livingston to TJ, 2 June 1803 (Vol. 40:470-4).

letter urging him to send us his answer to the Western Limits of Louisiana: Monroe and Pinckney to Cevallos, 9 Apr. (Monroe, Papers description begins Daniel Preston and others, eds., The Papers of James Monroe, Westport, Conn., 2003- , 7 vols. description ends , 5:367-9).

another answer from Mr Armstrong: Armstrong to Monroe, 5 Apr. (Madison, Papers, Sec. of State Ser. description begins William T. Hutchinson, Robert A. Rutland, J. C. A. Stagg, and others, eds., The Papers of James Madison, Chicago and Charlottesville, 1962- , 43 vols.; Sec. of State Ser., 1986- , 12 vols.; Pres. Ser., 1984-2020, 11 vols.; Ret. Ser., 2009- , 3 vols. description ends , 9:95, 98n, 205n; Preston, Catalogue, 1:166).

Cevallos gave Spain’s answer to the Western Limits in a lengthy letter to Monroe and Pinckney dated 13 Apr., which dismissed American attempts to carry Louisiana’s western boundary to the Rio Grande (Rio Bravo) as “illusory.” Citing historical evidence dating to the late seventeenth century, Cevallos asserted that the boundary between Louisiana and the province of Texas should consist of a line commencing on the Gulf of Mexico between the Calcasieu and Mermentau Rivers and running north, passing between Los Adaes and Natchitoches, to the Red River. Since the limits north of this point “are doubtful and little known,” they should be referred to the “prudent investigation” of a joint commission (Monroe, Papers description begins Daniel Preston and others, eds., The Papers of James Monroe, Westport, Conn., 2003- , 7 vols. description ends , 5:373-7).

For Robert R. Livingston’s recently proposed scheme for acquiring Florida, see Pinckney to TJ, 28 Jan.

our ultimatum: Monroe and Pinckney to Cevallos, 12 May (Monroe, Papers description begins Daniel Preston and others, eds., The Papers of James Monroe, Westport, Conn., 2003- , 7 vols. description ends , 5:389-91). Cevallos’s final rejection: Cevallos to Monroe and Pinckney, 15 May (same, 393-4).

Irvine: that is, George W. Erving, the recently appointed secretary of the U.S. legation to Spain (TJ to the Senate, 13 Nov. 1804).

our public letters: see Monroe and Pinckney to Madison, 1 Mch. and 23 May (Madison, Papers, Sec. of State Ser. description begins William T. Hutchinson, Robert A. Rutland, J. C. A. Stagg, and others, eds., The Papers of James Madison, Chicago and Charlottesville, 1962- , 43 vols.; Sec. of State Ser., 1986- , 12 vols.; Pres. Ser., 1984-2020, 11 vols.; Ret. Ser., 2009- , 3 vols. description ends , 9:79-82, 385-93). Pinckney’s private one to Madison, which largely duplicated the arrangement and content of his letter to TJ printed above, included a paraphrased copy of his 28 Feb. letter to Madison with additions dated from 18 Mch. to 22 May (same, 91-9).

1Preceding two words interlined in Pinckney’s hand.

2Preceding six words interlined in Pinckney’s hand.

3Word interlined by Pinckney in place of “scale.”

4Name inserted by Pinckney into blank in text. In this and subsequent instances he may have originally intended to encipher the name.

5Name inserted by Pinckney into blank in text.

6Name inserted by Pinckney into blank in text.

7Preceding two words inserted by Pinckney into blank in text.

8Word inserted by Pinckney into blank in text.

9Name inserted by Pinckney into blank in text.

10Name inserted by Pinckney into blank in text.

11Remainder of paragraph in Pinckney’s hand.

12The clerk here canceled “immeasurable.”

13Remainder of text in Pinckney’s hand.

14The remainder of the text of the February letter differs from the RC (see Vol. 45:599).

15Preceding five words interlined.

16Word interlined in place of “qualified.”

Index Entries